tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-988599552908585128.post8426028238990769624..comments2023-10-16T01:09:58.286-07:00Comments on BC Iconoclast: BC Prosperity Fund and conflicting data on LNGBernardhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15951619465188564252noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-988599552908585128.post-32602460004060416832013-02-13T10:59:03.067-08:002013-02-13T10:59:03.067-08:00"If this Prosperity Fund makes sense, why not..."If this Prosperity Fund makes sense, why not start now by putting all the non-renewable resource revenues into it?"<br /><br />You answered that question in the sentence that preceded it.<br /><br />The plan seems to be to destroy the northern half of the province to fund the lifestyle of the southern half, in one great roll of the dice at the tables of the the Non-Renewable Resources Casino (Open Every Night! Prime Rib Buffet!), in an act of petro-desperation.Brianhttp://brtrain.wordpress.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-988599552908585128.post-11223642925697778772013-02-12T19:53:48.229-08:002013-02-12T19:53:48.229-08:00Great analysis Bernard..And just look at the LNG o...Great analysis Bernard..And just look at the LNG over-budget nightmare in Australia, who by the way are 5 years ahead of us..<br /><br /><br />http://powellriverpersuader.blogspot.ca/2013/02/british-columbias-lng-corporate-welfare.htmlGrant Ghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11944976348166120530noreply@blogger.com