First off, revenues from natural resources is projected to be $3,100,000,000 while at the same time the natural resource ministries will see a fall of 25% to $880,000,000.
BC derives much of its well being from natural resources. For us to manage the resources, we need ministries that are well funded and have enough staff and resources to know what is going on with the landbase of this province.
Would it not be reasonable to peg natural resource ministry budgets to the amount of revenues that come in? Say 50% be available for the ministries, research or infrastructure improvements.
The current estimates the government is using for natural resources revenues are conservative. The price of 2x4s is estimated for 2011 at 3.5% below current prices. Copper is running at about $4.50 a pound but estimated to be at $3.65 for this year and $3.40 next year, other than the during the height of the global downturn, this is conservative. Pulp prices are in the range of $960 a tonne versus $888 for this year in the budget.
The only commodity that seems to be well forecast is metallurgical coal at $220+ per tonne.
The budget does not seem to capture the potential of new mines opening in BC. Copper Mountain could be open in a few months and bring 100,000,000 pounds of copper with gold and silver equivalents. What is coming down the line soon - Schaft Creek could open soon, Mount Milligan will be operating in early 2013, EB coal mine slated to open by early 2013. In the next five years there could be six to eight more mines open in BC. Mining revenues could possibly more than double within five years to close to $20,000,000,000 assuming prices for metals and coal do not rise. More than a 1% increase in GDP per year for each of the next five years.
I strongly suspect that BC will see some significant windfall resource revenues over the next few years and we could quite possibly be without a deficit for this year. Being prudent and underestimating the current financial situation is a good thing, though I suspect they are being very conservative.
Bernard, the tight gas/shale gas plays in the Montney/Horn River/ Cordova Embayment basins provide incredible future revenue-generating potential but they are seemingly still under the radar.
ReplyDeleteTransCanada Pipeline recently stated that they forecast 35% of Canada's natural gas to flow from their newly approved pipeline to the Horn River Basin. That's huge.
Petro China recently purchased a 50% interest in Encana's Cutbank Ridge play for $5.4 billion within the Horn River Basin - a small part of the Horn River Basin at that.
FWIW, that deal made news on BBC World News. Similar Asian players such as Mitsubishi and Korea Gas are also taking similar 50% equity stakes in other areas in the NE region.
And the proposed Kitimat lng terminal may see a twin elsewhere on the coast as well.
BC, potentially, could rival Alberta for natural gas production within the decade. And natural gas royalty revenue has always been the bread and butter of the Albertan gov't.
Keep a closer eye on the NE natural gas situation. It will be an eye-opener over the next decade.
http://www.calgaryherald.com/business/Yedlin+Encana+deal+sign+things+come/4282928/story.html?cid=megadrop_story