Friday, November 9, 2012

How not to use Social Media


Look before you leap - I made a mistake earlier and assumed that people had set up automated tweets a year ago that were still going out, it is not uncommon to see supporters of campaigns make this mistake.   In this case the mistake was I did not look closely enough and notice that it was a bad case of spambots.

To be clear, I apologize to the Dean Fortin Campaign from last year for my error.   To try and make amends I will try and report as many of the spambots as I can today.   I should have done my homework better as I did get fooled.

I leave the text up here so you can see what I had to say and not to try and hide from my error.



In the 2011 Victoria Civic Election the campaign team of Mayor Dean Fortin it would seem created many Twitter accounts that made automated tweets in the run up to election day a year ago.   It seems someone forgot to turn them off as they are still tweeting in 2012.

Certainly this is not the best way to use social media and I think will make a few people look a bit embarrassed.  Steve Filipovic alerted me to this.

Here are the most recent ones - they are all similar messages:



yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 



yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam I feel like I am trick-or-treating for democracy 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 
yyjvotes deanteam So windy I can't feel my face. 

Wednesday, November 7, 2012

Calgary Centre Candidates for the by-election - one of the expected candidates did not have enough signatures

Candidates in your electoral district
Candidate nameStatusName of partyOffice phone numberName of official agentName of auditor
Joan CrockattConfirmedConservative Party of Canada(403) 768-0118Michael David KahnGary Rozon
Antoni GrochowskiConfirmedIndependent(403) 277-2222Adam NadelskiFred Erlendson
Harvey LockeConfirmedLiberal Party of Canada(403) 262-5886Amanda Lori KriaskiNelson Halpern
Dan MeadesConfirmedNew Democratic Party(403) 460-0952Marc Edward PowerStacey-Ann Campbell
Tony PrashadConfirmedLibertarian Party of Canada(587) 227-0488Nicholas ChanStacy Campbell
Chris TurnerConfirmedGreen Party of Canada(403) 294-9121James Arthur HeringtonStacey Campbell

Progressive Canadian Candidate Ben Christensen did not manage to get 100 signatures - here is what he had to say on twitter about it:
What this highlights to me is that it is good to always get a lot more signatures than you need and then submit your forms early enough that you have time to correct them before nominations close.

Getting 100 signatures is not a hard task - the Liberatian managed it as did independent Antoni Grochowski.

Obama 332 to Romney 206 - Nate Silver got the US election right

I have been following US presidential elections closely since late 1987 when I was 22 and started to read the Economist weekly.    It is only with my discovery of Nate Silver when he started projecting the US election on the Daily Kos in late 2007 that I finally found someone that could give me the data and analysis I was looking for to understand what is going on in the US election.   In 2008 he got 50 or 51 right, he only missed Indiana

I won a few bets on the US election about who would win - the last ones I took about three or four weeks ago I was agreeing to four to one odds that Obama would win.  The only reason I had any confidence in making those bets was because of all the data Nate Silver provided.

Nate Silver had the states breaking out 332 Obama and 206 Romney - he got all 51 correct this time.   In 2008 he missed one stated.   He projected a popular vote of 50.8% Obama to 48.3% for Romney.   At the moment we are at Obama 50.4% and Romney 48.1%.  There are about 1 to 1.5 million votes still to come in  and mainly in locations that are pro Obama.   At the end of all the counting the vote percentage should be 50.6% Obama and 47.9% Romney.   Nate Silver looks like he will end up being marginally high for both candidates.

There was a single state where the winner and loser were within one percentage point, Florida.   This was also the only state at the end of the election that Nate Silver had as actually competitive.  

For the last week or so I have been pointing out to people that this was not a close presidential election and that Obama had a lock on the electoral college.  In the worst case scenario it would be Obama 281 to Romney at 257, but they seemed overly pessimistic.  I was leaning towards Obama 303 to Romney 235 until last Friday when I became convinced from the Silver data that Obama would win Florida.

Nationwide polls are useless in predicting the US election, something I had realized years ago.  Over the last week people were listening to nationwide polls that showed Obama and Romney close to each other, what they were not listening to were the polls showing Obama overwhelmingly winning all the swing states and even threatening to win North Carolina.

The closest Romney ever came in Nate Silver's projection of winning was a 1/3 chance on October 14th - the notional electoral college was Obama 285.6 to Romney 252.4 on that date and vote percentage of 49.9% Obama and 49.0% Romney.

The only surprise in this election was the Democratic win in the North Dakota Senate seat - admittedly it was a close race and there were few polls to go on.  He did also lean towards the Republicans winning the Montana senate seat but called it a close race and the Democrats won.